Month: May 2007

Blue Ridge Parkway

Having J in America has meant re-visiting a lot of places: Biltmore, parks, etc.

This weekend we finally went out to the Blue Ridge Parkway, specifically Craggy Gardens…

And Mount Mitchell

It was, I believe, J’s first “true” picnic. The tradition in Poland is equally pleasant, but a little more “adult.” It involves a bonfire, some sausage, and a lot of vodka.

The last part is optional, but once you say “yes” to an offered drink, turning down a subsequent shot is virtually impossible.

And that’s why the thought of posting “No Alcoholic Beverages!” signs was somewhat odd for J.

Put your roots in the air like you just don’t care?

This weekend, we took J to Biltmore. We were hoping the gardens would be more fully developed (i.e., more in bloom), but the frigid spell in April literally nipped everything in the bud.

While out in the garden, though, we saw a most unusually tree.

Mystery

J had never seen anything like it, and I, not knowing a single thing about trees, was at even more of a loss.

Anyone have any idea what’s going on here?

1,000 Days

K and I have, as of yesterday, been married 1,000 days. I know this because I took a little VBA script I wrote that counted the days until I turned thirty (used in my journal) and had it count the days from a different date. (It was a boring, frigid Sunday afternoon when I wrote that, I’m sure.)

As such,  I’ve uploaded a lot of our wedding pictures to Flickr.

Romney

Sharpton’s words about Romney bring to the debate so much that it’s difficult to know where to start.

CBS News has a great editorial about this.

Sharpton is entirely justified to question Romney on his views on the racist aspects of Mormonism. Blacks were excluded from assuming positions of power until the late 1970s. We all know, of course, that Romney will condemn that aspect of his religion — it would be political suicide to do otherwise. In that sense, we’ll never know if we got a straight answer from him. But I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.

What’s most disturbing about Romney is his religion — a cult, by the standards of many orthodox Christians. It has all the earmarks:

  • exclusivity
  • specially “revealed” information
  • a founder who was somehow closer to God than anyone else

Oh, wait — I just described every major monotheistic religion, didn’t I?

Romney’s Mormonism will be problematic with many of his target constituency of conservative Christians. Evangelicals tend, I believe, to regard Mormons as misguided at best, Satanically deceived at best. Many of these same individuals (who would fall into the umbrella term “fundamentalists”) call Catholics non-Christians, and Catholicism is much closer, theologically, to evangelicalism than Mormonism is.

The question is whether Romney’s views on abortion and his generally conservative views — he is a Republican candidate, after all — will weigh more favorably with traditional Christian voters than his unorthodoxy.

Change in Perspective

Some days at work, things are so hectic, so zoo-like, that I used to think, “There is no way I can survive another day at this place.” Kids get wound up and call you everything you can possibly imagine–and several things you probably can’t. Sticks and stones and all that, but there’s only so many times a person can be called “f****** herpes-a** b****” by a fifteen-year-old before it starts to grate.

Today, someone literally screamed at me, “I don’t have a problem with my voice tone!” It’s hard to keep a straight face at times like that…

What a change a successful interview can make. Today, I was positively aglow, I’m sure. And though I shouldn’t have, at least once I laughed when a kid started gnawing on my last emotional nerve. I thought, “I won’t have to hear this for much longer.”

And yet — there’s always an “and yet”…

I finally feel I’ve got the hang of this, and I do feel that my work has helped these kids. Sure, they call me all sorts of things; they yell and scream sometimes; they threaten; they defy; they deny — but they’ve been doing it with decreasing frequency lately. Proof that something has been working.

Still, I am looking forward to the change. As is K — she’s already looking for houses…

It’s a Beautiful Day

It’s rare that we wake up with a sense that today something truly fortuitous will occur. I guess that has to do with the etymology of the word:

1653, from L. fortuitus, from forte “by chance,” abl. of fors “chance.” It means “accidental, undesigned” not “fortunate.” (Online Etymology Dictionary)

We can’t foresee luck — it would be the ultimate oxymoron.

All of that notwithstanding, I woke up this morning feeling positively positive. I arrived home in a bit of shock.

For some time, K and I have known we will be moving out of the Asheville area — the real estate market is ridiculously overpriced. Yet where to go? We needed a place that’s developing so K can get a job; we needed a place with good schools and lots of them. Greenville, just across the border in South Carolina, seemed the ideal locale.

Spring comes, and the school systems across the countries publish their anticipated and actual staffing needs for the next year. As such, for the past few weeks, I’ve been checking the Greenville County Schools website almost daily, applying for almost every English/LA position that appears.

Last Sunday evening I got a call.

“Have you accepted a teaching position yet?”

I think: “Are you kidding? I haven’t even heard much of a ‘we received your resume thank you very much.'” I say: “No, not yet.”

“Would you be able to come this Wednesday for an interview?”

I think: “Try keeping me way.” I say: “Certainly.”

How fortuitous. I have an interview, and I can drop by a few schools as well.

I wake up this morning feeling that something good is going to happen. Something better than good — something beyond unexpected.

First school: principal is there, but not available. We’ll take your resume and be in touch.

Such has been my experience. It’s understandable — principals are busy, to say the least, and they don’t have the time to see every single applicant who drops it to try to get a head-start on the rest of the pack.

I drive to the second school. The receptionist doesn’t know where the principal is, but gets on the now-standard walkie-talkie and asks the principal if he’s able to come meet me. He’s in his office, and within a few moments, I’m sitting across from him as he looks over my resume and asks a few questions. Then: “Okay — you’ve got five minutes. Sell me.”

I’m not dressed for an interview; I’m not expecting an interview; I’m certainly not prepared for an interview at this moment — but apparently I’m having an interview.

What do I say? Long story, and perhaps I’ll share it here. Probably not. Suffice it to say that I do fairly well. How do I know?

“Well, I don’t want to make a decision right now,” the principal says, “But let me get in touch with your references and I’ll be in touch.”

There are moments when you’re fairly sure your ears are compacted with wax, or have been blown like Pete Townsend’s, or are submerged in water — certainly he didn’t say by implication, “You’re almost hired.”

At any rate, I walk out to my car in a bit of a daze. “I knew something good was going to happen.”

Lunch with a friend, then I change into my Superman suit and head across town to the interview. The actual interview. The scheduled interview.

Questions about

  • the integration of technology and instruction;
  • how I keep up with developments in my field;
  • my comfort level of teaching to rigid standards (i.e., NCLB);
  • how I might go about creating an atmosphere that is conducive to learning;
  • what sorts of professional development programs might help me feel more comfortable teaching;
  • how I might bring my life experiences into the classroom; and,
  • how I dealt with the cultural and linguistic differences while teaching in Poland.

More questions, more answers — I am hot. I speak with a fluidity that I’ve never experienced in an interview. I’m enthusiastic. I’m succinct yet not wooden.

In the past, I’ve had absolutely awful interviews. I walk out to the car fighting the temptation to go back and say, “Look, let’s not play games. I know I blew it. Thank you for your time.”

During a pause in the interview, I think, “I might have a chance at this job!”

After that pause, I hear “And how would you respond if I offered you the position right now?”

Count to ten. Slowly.

I sat stunned for at least that long.

I think: “What would I do?!? Fight the urge to dance on the table! Swallow the ‘barbaric yawp’ that’s muscling it’s way up my throat!” I say, hoarsely: “Are you offering me the position?”

“Yes.”

Count to ten again. In the meantime, I look at all the other faces in the room. I remind myself that it’s May, not April. I slap myself mentally and shout, “You’re just sitting there like a zit, you dolt!”

What to say?

I go with the subjunctive voice:”I would ask when you would want a decision.”

“Now,” she says, with a warm and polite smile.

Red flags! Flashing lights! “Danger, Will Robinson!” Our Kia adventure made me hyper-sensitive to any kind of “decide now” situation. What’s going on? Do they have so few applicants? As Julie Andrews asks in Sound of Music, “What’s wrong the the children?”

As delicately as possible, I ask why the rush.

“Because we simply don’t want anyone else to snatch you up.”

I did wake up morning, didn’t I? I remember having my morning tea, followed by a now-rare morning coffee. No, I’m out of bed, showered, dressed, sitting in a conference room being offered a job, being told that my interview was “exemplary.”

After a tour of the school, meeting faculty and staff along the way, I go with my gut feeling. Back in the administrative offices, the principal says/asks, “So I’ll call you tomorrow?”

“No, I don’t think that will be necessary.”

The last person I meet on my way out is the secretary. “She’ll be sending your paperwork to the district office today,” says the principal.

And so, come August, I’ll be the new eighth-grade Language Arts teacher at Hughes Academy of Science and Technology.

Skills, Part II

L is gaining increasing control over her hands — so much so that she now can use her fist as a substitute when she’s lost her pacifier.

I originally wrote this several weeks ago, then put it on hold for some reason or another. Now it’s off hold, but I forgot to change “three months.” As of today, she’s just a little more than a week shy of five months.

Translation: we have a budding thumb-sucker.

Now, sucking a thumb is not bad. All parenting books I’ve read say as much. In fact, once L starts teething, our pediatrician informs us, it’ll be better if she sucks on her thumb than on her pacifier.

But for some reason, whenever that cute fist goes partially into her mouth, K and I instinctively pull it back out and re-insert the pacifier.

Why?

After all, a thumb is much more convenient than a pacifier.

  • It never falls to the floor.
  • It never gets lost.
  • It never gets left behind.
  • It’s readily available in the dark.

I suppose it’s an unfounded worry that, by letting our little girl start sucking her thumb, she’ll have a hard time later stopping. As she’s only three months old, it’s about like us worrying that she’ll want to go to a school known more for partying than learning.

It’s called “exaggeration.”

Girl at Play

DSC_6787
The Girl plays to the accompaniment of one of the most famous songs ever written.

We’re Holocaust deniers, each and every one

Holocaust denial is rampant in the Arab world. One doesn’t have to look too far to find it.

While looking for Holocaust images on Google, I found a discussion thread called “Myth of Holocaust Will Not Survive, French Historian” at IslamOnline.net.

French historian and professor of Sorbonne University Robert Faurisson said that the ‘myth of Holocaust’ fabricated by the Zionists would not survive.

Addressing the International Confernce on ‘World Vision on Holocaust’, Faurisson said that the gas chambers allegedly used by Hitler to massacre the Jews did never exist.

It didn’t take much to find it — I wasn’t even looking for it.

But who would have thought that we, American taxpayers, are actually supporting Arab/Islamic Holocaust denial?

Testifying under oath recently, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice misled Congress in her strong defense of Al-Hurra, the taxpayer financed Arab TV network. It was unwitting, though. She herself was misled.

During the March 21 House Foreign Operations Appropriations subcommittee hearing, Rep. Mark Kirk (R., Ill.) pressed Ms. Rice on the wisdom of providing a platform to Islamic terrorists, citing Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah’s Dec. 7 speech, which Al-Hurra aired live. The broadcast speech “went on for 30 minutes,” she responded, “followed by commentary, much of which was critical of Nasrallah.”

In fact, Mr. Nasrallah’s speech was carried in its entirety, roughly an hour and eight minutes. The commentary that followed–a 13-minute phone interview with Wael Abou Faour, a member of Lebanon’s governing coalition–was indeed critical of Mr. Nasrallah. He accused the Hezbollah leader of not being anti-U.S. and anti-Israel enough. While Mr. Nasrallah had claimed Lebanon’s governing coalition was aligned with the U.S. and had backed Israel during the war last summer, Mr. Abou Faour said that Hezbollah was actually closer to the U.S and added that any Lebanese faction that assisted “the Israeli enemy” should not be allowed to engage in political discussion because “the only place they should be [is] in prison.” […]

Under Mr. Register, Al-Hurra covered the Holocaust denial conference in Tehran last December. But in a stark break from Mr. Harb’s era, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the attendees at his conference were treated with unmistakable deference.

Al-Hurra’s Dec. 12 report on the gathering included David Duke’s praise for Mr. Ahmadinejad, and it took at face value the organizers’ demand for Israel “to provide proof and evidence that certifies the occurrence” of the Holocaust. An official running the event was afforded the opportunity to show the open-mindedness of Holocaust deniers: “If we actually conclude with our experts through this meeting that the Holocaust is a real incident we will at that time admit its presence.” (Transcript provided by a fluent Arabic-speaking U.S. government employee.)

So we’re paying for a station that provides a platform for anti-Semitic rantings. What about the reporters themselves? Surely they are more objective.

The Al-Hurra reporter stationed in Tehran referred to those who believe Hitler killed six million Jews as “Holocaust supporters.” He took a swipe at the handful of conference attendees who didn’t deny the Holocaust, by noting that they “didn’t enforce their statements with scientific evidence.” In closing the piece, he referred to Israel as “the Jewish state on Palestinian lands.” (Wall Street Journal)

At least something, though, is providing a little bit of bi-partisanship on Capital Hill…

Chimney Rock

Sunday was the second time we’d been to Chimney Rock. The first time, we were sans L, sans camcorder, sans D70. That, of course, means lots of images of the Girl and a bit of video of the girl.

L began the day in my custody:

Chimney Portrait

But fussiness overwhelmed her about 2/3 of the way through the outing — only K could comfort (what alliteration).

Mom and Girl above Falls

More pictures at Flickr; video coming soon.

Turning Heads

I’m constantly amazed at all the things L has to learn, and how quickly she learns them. She learned those things waving around in front of her face were hers, and then she learned to control them. She’s figured out that those growths from her lower body are hers, too, and she’s learning to control them too.

Both those examples are very concrete.

Lately she’s been getting into the abstract.

We noticed last night, for instance, that she’s figured out a major fact about the world around her: it generally stays in the same place, and it’s she that moves. She was watching K load the dishwasher, and I turn around 180 degrees. She quickly turned her head and continued watching. And it took me just a couple of seconds to realize the significance of what she’d done. I turned back around again; she turned her head again, and giggled when K kissed her cheek.