We’ve had the wide end covered for some time now. I bought a Sigma 10-20mm before heading to Polska last year, and of course the camera came with a decent 18-70mm standard zoom. What we were lacking was a high power zoom.
It was never much of a priority, so I wasn’t looking to spend a lot of money. Sure, I’d love to have Nikon’s 80-200 2.8 lens, but at nearly a thousand dollars, it was well out of my budget. If I had no budget, I’d be ordering a
- Nikon D3x
- AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G
- AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED
- AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED
- AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED
- AF-S Micro-NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED
- AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
Having a budget that doesn’t quite make the approximately $13,000 necessary to buy that equipment, I looked back at SIgma, being very pleased with the 10-20. So for well under $200 I got a 70-300 4/5.6 zoom. Is it a great lens? For the money, yes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2002d/2002d93b68bc75fbf44b85baae4e7a0928d2d83b" alt="DSC_3383"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78e82/78e82ff945071404febc97c85abc2d2a4c2c8394" alt="DSC_3397"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dba5a/dba5af720b363ee647fa8114ab37f78b016c06e4" alt="DSC_3400"
The bokeh is particularly warm and deep, but that’s to be expected at this kind of focal length…