Cho Seung-hui went through the mandatory background check before buying the guns he used in his rampage. No criminal record, no problem.
Yet…
- He’d been admitted to a mental health care unit within the last eighteen months.
- Teachers and students alike commented on his disturbing behavior.
- Complaints had been made about his behavior.
- A professor had raised concerns about the content of his writing.
But what kind of a background check could have discovered all this?
If if someone has recently received significant mental health care in the same state he’s trying to buy a gun, it’s conceivable that that information could be available. But since there’s no national database of such information, all one would have to do is cross the state line.
Do we want a national database to record that kind of information? I don’t think I do.
Do we want to have background checks that include interviews with former educators? Is that even feasible?
Just what kind of background check can stop someone like this from getting a gun? The only solutions I can think of involve national databases and inquiries into very personal information.