A wise woman once wrote,
I, too, am saddened by so much of what I read in blogs, and comment threads are even worse. It’s as if writers are grabbing the mike and running to the stage without having once practiced the song they are about to force onto the audience. At first it seems funny and then it just seems sad, desperate, irresponsible.
Raging, inarticulate personal attacks in comments and posts are becoming all too common.
There are blogs that are devoted just to criticizing other blogs. And it’s not just attacks because of political views, but attacks based on, well, anything that doesn’t suit the “reviewer.”
There are also bloggers who go around biting ankles in comments.
Regrettably I’ve done both. This post is what’s left after all the spittle has been wiped away and people began talking civilly.
“It’s easy to tear down than to build up,” said my mother (though I suspect not just mine), and the truth of that is becoming more and more evident in blogs and comments. A few examples show the childish creativity we employ (and I’ve included my own comments in this list):
- don’t feel bad because you’re dumb
- as obviously immature as you are
- It’s called symbolism–does that elude you? I know the topic of my post did.
- lots of passion here and lots of anger but not much reason
- the world may not miss you
- These people are cowards
- So as to be clear — we wish there to be no misundertandings — you are an in idiot. While I’m sure you have plenty of self esteem and the trophies to prove it, you remain an idiot.
- Have fun in Poland, hope you aren’t Jewish.
- a mean spirited, self-centered liar, spreading small-minded insults
- I cannot believe there are people like you out there, but then again, you are from [location deleted]
- Damn! In the above post, some idiot forgot to edit before he sent […]
- She is articulate; you are not. She is thoughtful; you are not.
- When you grow up and enter the real world you’ll realize that common sense and rational judgement [sic] will take you a lot farther than anger, bitterness and sarcasm
There is a full range of personal attacks and libel here. There are subtle jibes:
- “Does that elude you? I know the topic of my post did.” naturally implies, “You’re a dolt because you didn’t understand my post.”
- “When you grow up and enter the real world” implies, “You’re childish now.”
There are not so subtle jabs:
- a mean spirited, self-centered liar, spreading small-minded insults
- I cannot believe there are people like you out there, but then again, you are from [location deleted]
There are nuclear strikes:
- don’t feel bad because you’re dumb
- as obviously immature as you are
And at least one hinted at something much bigger than a personal attack: “Have fun in Poland, hope you aren’t Jewish.”
Some of these comments were catalysts for others in the list, so it’s easy to see how things can spin out of control.
We attack; we get attacked; we retaliate more viciously than we were attacked; one of our friends sees the tangle and jumps in to help — soon it’s a playground brawl.
The problem is that the blogosphere is messy. It’s part of the aptly called “the web,” so it’s inherently difficult to track everything down and find out who indeed did start. By jumping in, as I have foolishly done, we may end up attacking the attacked when we should have turned our backs on the whole mess and gone to hang out at the swings.
“If you can’t say anything nice…”
Another problem is that the internet is essentially anonymous, and thus emotionally free:
People have no hesitation at being ugly over the internet simply because there is no cost to them. There is no personal investment to online discourse. The lack of personal interaction allows people to be as ugly as they want to be…which is often pretty ugly (Robert Fenton)
It’s like the crank calls my friends and I used to make back in the eighties when there was no caller ID and we were simply voices on the other end of the line. We can create whole personas on the internet, complete with false pictures, names, stats – everything. And in that liberated, new “us,” some of us show the darker, more immature sides of ourselves more often than we do in person. We’re all split personalities, as role theory points out, but the online personality can have a bit uglier voice than the others.
“I always think it is a shame when people stoop to personal attacks on other people, no matter what the medium” (Renee). My crank calls were never not so vitriolic as some of the things I’ve seen in comments.
In the end, it’s obviously better to sit back and watch the cat fights than to get involved. Sound advice for myself, a bit too late.
Hope this doesn’t sound horribly patronising, but – I don’t think it’s ever too late to learn stuff. I’ve been on the planet for a few decades and I still have plenty to learn about how to relate to people, how to manage conflict… this post helped me. Thank you.
I stand firm behind my Jewish statement. What is shameful, is the way that Europe has treated it’s Jews.
You will do well, also, to practice what you preach.
It must be fun to live in the fantasy that is Europe.
Well written, I like it.
Interesting, that you quoted my “mean spirited” comment more than once.
I agree with you in theory that we should all play nice together, despite the fact that the anonymity of the Internet permits people to be nasty so easily.
However, if someone truly IS acting on their weblog like a “mean spirited, self-centered liar”, surely it’s not a bad thing to stand up to them, as opposed to letting them get away with it without a challenge…?