matching tracksuits

fun in threes, sometimes fours

education and teaching

Faking It

Juliet is dead now — at least in the eyes of her parents and extended family. Instead of marrying Paris today and going off to live in bliss as her parents anticipated, she has died in her sleep.

It’s strange how easily Friar Laurence manages to steer the family away from all thoughts other than the one he most desperately desires: get her buried as soon as possible, for who knows — from his perspective — what will happen if his potion wears off before they get her in the family crypt.

But why isn’t Capulet more concerned with what happened? How could a young girl die so suddenly? I think the notion, prevalent then, that someone could die of a broken heart goes a long way in explaining this. For Capulet, it’s easy enough just to accept the fact that Juliet never really got over her sorrow for Tybalt’s death, and it was of that broken heart that she died.

Negotiation

Going over some words in class today that might be new to some students (it was my remedial class), I started asking kids questions about the words.

“What might you prioritize as a student?”

“Your work!” someone responded. If only, young man, if only.

“What might I make projections about as a teacher?”

“Grades.” Yes, and if only you knew the projections — no, you probably do.

“With whom might you negotiate?”

“Your parents.” Of course.

“I don’t negotiate with my parents,” says one boy. “I do what I want.”

Bravado or inadvertent succint social commentary?

Test Day

I swear, I've been teaching more than 20 years now, and I still cannot make a test for a gifted class that doesn't just decimate the confidence of a significant number of students.

"Mr. S, I felt so much better about this test than the last one!"

I went through the test before the kids took it today and made some modifications that I was sure would help.

I had a couple of questions that, if one read it carefully, actually answered a couple of other questions partially. I made sure every passage I asked detailed questions about had appeared in in-depth in-class discussion/analysis. And still, a significant number of students were very disappointed with their scores.

But "decimating the confidence of a significant number of students" is not the same as "a large number of failing grades." In fact, of 55 students who have taken it so far (several are absent for obvious 2022 reasons), only two failed outright. The curve, without any fiddling, looks quite acceptable:

Yet this type of curve is completely unacceptable to a group of high-achieving honors students. There will, no doubt, be requests for extra credit and the like.

(Side note: this marks post number 5,000. How ridiculous!)

Some of My Kiddos

A gaggle of girls came to the basketball game tonight to watch their friends play — all of them my students.

What a sweet bunch of girls. They’re like that in class, too.

It’s a pleasure working with kids like this.

Snow Days 2022 — Day 6: No-Snow Snow Day

There was no snow on the ground to speak of where we live; no snow on the roads at all. Yet we had another e-learning day today.

The Boy took all the cushions from the couch and made a little study corner for his work. The Girl remained in her hobbit-hole room.

After lunch, the girls headed to Tennessee for a volleyball tournament; the boys began the countdown to a boys’-night-out dinner: Mexican.

As I was putting the Boy to bed tonight, I realized I hadn’t checked to see if the forecast had been correct — the cause for all the worry today, I guess. Sure enough, there was a dusting of fresh snow. If tomorrow weren’t Saturday, I’m sure it’d be another e-learning day…

Snow Days 2022 — Day 3

Today was an e-learning day -- the first would-be snow day that transmuted into a strange school day spent sitting in front of a computer. For an English teacher, a math teacher -- for numerous subjects, it's a fairly straightforward thing. But how do band teachers do e-learning days? What assignments do PE teachers give? "Go play in the snow until you're out of breath!"

In the afternoon, I finally left the house -- the first time since Saturday. I found shelves mostly empty in the poultry section. There's probably some metaphor here, but I'm going to leave that for you to construct.

Decorations

Our three teams on the eighth-grade hall are having a contest to see who can decorate their portion of the hallway the most elaborately -- which means simply quantity. Our team took matters into their own hands today, or rather on their own shoulders.

Coincidentally, the scouts today also did some decorating -- after they got the badges and pins. The decoration pictures are still on the phone, which is still upstairs. So we'll have to settle for our imagination on that one.

Beginning R&J

Monday After

Our first day back after the break, and we had quite a change: for the first time since March 2020 we ate lunch in the cafeteria. By “we” I mean our team, which constitutes one-third of the eighth-grade students. And it’s a one-day-a-week gig only: we can’t get everyone in there and maintain social distance, so we get Mondays.

Such a strange thing to return to what was a taken-for-granted reality for so long after such an extended break.

Back home, though, it was a return to familiar routines that paused a little during the extended break: a small dinner (barszcz ukrainski — the first time in ages that we’ve had that wonder of the culinary world), a bit of reading, an early bedtime.

In Front of Them?

We're working on a tricky standard in school in my on-level classes. They'll have a TDA (text-dependent analysis) question as part of their year-end test, and it's often a question about how some text develops some idea or other. It might even provide an excerpt and ask specifically how that passage contributes to this or that idea. It's not a straightforward question, and while I'm not entirely sure it's a useful question to pursue with kids who have difficulty reading at grade level, I am obliged to some degree or other to teach to the test. That's what we've done the last couple of days. We worked through a text together and then figured out how to answer such a question. Today, students were working to do it on their own.

Part of the process, I taught them, is to take the main idea of the text and compare it with the passage the question wants us to analyze. "See what similarities they have, what differences. Think about the relationships between those." Since the first multiple-choice comprehension question for our article "Why I Refuse To Say I 'Fight' My Disability" was "Which of the following statements best expresses a central idea of the article?" I knew we could save time in determining the main idea for ourselves. We evaluated the four possibilities and realized it was the first option: "Hitselberger’s disability is an important part of who she is, not an enemy that she needs to defeat."

The analysis question didn't deal with just one or two sentences; it dealt with the entire final third of the article. "How do paragraphs 5-14 contribute to the development of ideas in the text?" At first I thought, "Great, the kids will have to comb through nine paragraphs to find the answer." Then I looked at the nine paragraphs. I didn't have to look closely: the relationship is literally plastered throughout the passage.

I will say I fight ableism and prejudice.

I will say I fight lack of access, stigma and ignorance.

I will say I fight discrimination.

I will say I fight these things, because I do. These are battles to fight, and win. It is ableism, prejudice, lack of access, stigma, ignorance and discrimination that prevent me from having the same opportunities in life as my able-bodied brother and sister, not my cerebral palsy, my wheelchair or my inability to walk.

I will fight to make this world a better place for future generations of kids just like me.

I will fight to make sure they are never told or led to believe their bodies are a problem or something they must do battle against on a daily basis just to fit in.

I will fight to make sure those kids have the same opportunities as everybody else, and never believe everything would be better if they could just change who they are.

I will fight for a world where the mere presence of disability does not make you extraordinary. Where disabled children are taught to aspire to more than just existing, and where being disabled doesn’t mean you have to be 10 times better than everyone else just to be good enough.

I will fight for a world where we talk about living with and owning our disabled bodies rather than overcoming them.

I will fight for a better world, and a better future, because those things are worth fighting for, but I will not fight a war against myself.

So it's simple, I thought. The main idea statement is "Hitselberger’s disability is an important part of who she is, not an enemy that she needs to defeat." Every single paragraph of the passage begins with "I will fight." It's not terribly difficult to see the connection between "fight," "enemy," and "defeat." So the main idea statement says that the author will not fight her disability while the passage gives a list of things the author will fight.

Most of them could not see it. I phrased it differently and rephrased it again. Many of them could still not see it.

I've been thinking about this all day, wondering what went wrong. Was it the presentation? I'd like to think I'd done a decent job scaffolding the learning: we'd practiced the very same thing with the very same question yesterday. The only difference was the text. Was it the students? Just as I'd like to think I wasn't responsible, I'd like to think it wasn't a question of student culpability because there are only two ways to explain it: they can't do it, or they won't do it. Neither one is appealing. Yet of all three options, I wonder if the truth isn't hidden in one of them. It's not a question of intelligence or reading ability; perhaps it's just a question of critical thinking.