COVID-19 quarantine
Day 39: Rain
It rained today. Almost the entire day. Being stuck at home is not that bad when we can go outside, but being stuck in the house makes for a long day. In the grand scheme of things, that’s a petty issue, I realize. But such was our reality today.
What’s more, E swears he’s tired of all the games. Sorry? “No!” Monopoly? “No!” Uno? “No!” He was up for chess, but one can hardly play three-person chess.
Well, it exists, but I’ve never played it, and we don’t have a board.
Day 38: Hybrid Walk
This evening's walk was a hybrid: the kids wanted to go exploring; we wanted just a normal walk. So we began in the woods, then emerged in the adjacent neighborhood and headed back to the house the long way.

The Boy snapped pictures most of the way. And, somewhat predictably, the Girl, seeing E having all the fun, wanted to take a few pictures herself. Well, that sounds a little too cynical: she has expressed a slight interest in photography, but there is always that thirteen-year-old aspect to her that, well, I don't know. She's thirteen. That's really all we need to say.





On the way back, so much silliness. I can't remember the last time L, E, and K were so silly with each other, laughing at nonsense, making more nonsense just to make everyone laugh all the harder.

And Clover and I the only ones keeping things serious. Sort of.
We got back with time to spare before I had to start getting the Boy ready for bed. For our reading, we continued with what we've been slogging through for some time now: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. It's not that it's a bad book: E insists that Verne is a master of cliffhangers. But he does seem to get a little carried away with himself. For example, one chapter begins thusly:
The Mediterranean, the blue sea par excellence, "the great sea" of the Hebrews, "the sea" of the Greeks, the "mare nostrum" of the Romans, bordered by orange-trees, aloes, cacti, and sea-pines; embalmed with the perfume of the myrtle, surrounded by rude mountains, saturated with pure and transparent air, but incessantly worked by underground fires; a perfect battlefield in which Neptune and Pluto still dispute the empire of the world!
It's not a passage for a seven-year-old. "What's 'par excellence mean?" "Who were the Hebrews?" "What are Greeks?" "'Mare nostrum' -- what's that?" "What does 'embalmed' mean?"
The next chapter -- the very next chapter -- begins thusly:
The Atlantic! a vast sheet of water whose superficial area covers twenty-five millions of square miles, the length of which is nine thousand miles, with a mean breadth of two thousand seven hundred—an ocean whose parallel winding shores embrace an immense circumference, watered by the largest rivers of the world, the St. Lawrence, the Mississippi, the Amazon, the Plata, the Orinoco, the Niger, the Senegal, the Elbe, the Loire, and the Rhine, which carry water from the most civilised, as well as from the most savage, countries! Magnificent field of water, incessantly ploughed by vessels of every nation, sheltered by the flags of every nation, and which terminates in those two terrible points so dreaded by mariners, Cape Horn and the Cape of Tempests.
"Jules, you're killing me!" I wanted to yell. But it did give us some laughs.
In truth, though, I've been skipping -- sometimes rather liberally. Take this passage from tonight's chapter, for example:
Two hours after quitting the Nautilus we had crossed the line of trees, and a hundred feet above our heads rose the top of the mountain, which cast a shadow on the brilliant irradiation of the opposite slope. Some petrified shrubs ran fantastically here and there. Fishes got up under our feet like birds in the long grass. The massive rocks were rent with impenetrable fractures, deep grottos, and unfathomable holes, at the bottom of which formidable creatures might be heard moving. My blood curdled when I saw enormous antennae blocking my road, or some frightful claw closing with a noise in the shadow of some cavity. Millions of luminous spots shone brightly in the midst of the darkness. They were the eyes of giant crustacea crouched in their holes; giant lobsters setting themselves up like halberdiers, and moving their claws with the clicking sound of pincers; titanic crabs, pointed like a gun on its carriage; and frightful-looking poulps, interweaving their tentacles like a living nest of serpents.
That got cut to this:
Two hours after quitting the Nautilus we had crossed the line of trees, and a hundred feet above our heads rose the top of the mountain, which cast a shadow on the brilliant irradiation of the opposite slope. Some petrified shrubs ran fantastically here and there. Fishes got up under our feet like birds in the long grass.
I've determined that I'm not a fan of such novels, which seem to be nothing but a litany of adventures leading to -- to what? Aronnax, Ned Land, and Conseil want to escape, but thus far, there's been precious little talk of it and a lot of chatter about all the marvels Nemo is showing them.
Fortunately, the Boy agrees in part: we can do without all the descriptive flourishes -- let's get to the action. And through it so we can read something else. Perhaps Tom Sawyer?
Day 37: Tuesday
The Boy was at it again today -- 177 photos spread through the day, from morning to evening.

Today, he got some really good shots. Part of that came from experimentation: I let him use a telephoto zoom, which helped him fill the frame more that he's done the last two days. He liked it, but in the end, he preferred the little prime lens he'd been using. "It's so much less bulky!" he exclaimed.

He also learned a little lesson: not everyone whats to be photographed all the time. The Girl, for example, appears less frequently in here because she's increasingly resistant to photographs. (What 13-year-old wants dad writing blog posts about her?) During dinner, then, he asked everyone who's willing to let him photograph them. Only L opted out.
But he still snuck a few shots, much to her frustration.
"If you're a spy, it's okay to take pictures without permission. Otherwise, it's not a good idea," I said.
Excitedly, he heard what he wanted: "If I were a spy I could..."
"But you're not." I could envision him redefining that word to suit his own purposes.

I'm afraid, though, that I might have encouraged it the other day.
"What do you like taking pictures of, Daddy? What's your favorite thing?"
"I like taking pictures that show people just being, just doing what they do every day without thinking about it." If I had more guts, I might be able to parley that into a gig as a street photographer, which in its own way is a certain kind of spy.

There was a little photo session after dinner, with the Boy getting a few poses out of K. He walked over to her and manipulated her arms into the position he wanted -- something like a dab -- and then took his position. "Perfect."

Day 36: The Photographer!
The Boy is hooked -- for now. But still, hooked. I gave him our old Nikon D70s (older than L) and a 35mm lens, which on a crop sensor like the D70 is like a 50mm lens on a film camera (in other words, what all of us who learned to shoot with film started with), and told him to look for two things: interesting light and interesting lines.








He didn't always take that advice -- he did what everyone fascinated with photograph does in the beginning. He took pictures like crazy. 266 pictures, to be exact. I chose eight from them, chose a preset for each one in Lightroom and did no other editing.
This is probably the only post I've had here without a single one of my own pictures...
Day 35: The Photographer?






The Boy has been showing an interest in photography from time to time. It's not an everyday thing, but he enjoys it when I give him the little Fuji to shoot with.

This afternoon, we went out on a photo walk, and he asked me if it would be possible for him to edit some of the photos in Paint.net, a free editing program that I use for quick things like cropping screenshots and the like. I'd taught him how to do gradient overlays with it, and he loved the idea of editing photos like that.


"Do you use Paint.net for your photos?" he asked.
"No, I use Lightroom."
"Can you put gradients on pictures in Lightroom?"
Technically, yes, I thought, but not the way he was thinking. "Not really, but you can in Photoshop."
"Can you teach me how to do it in Photoshop?" The Boy loves to learn if it's something he's interested in -- but then, doesn't that describe us all?


"Well, for what you were doing, it's probably best just to keep using Paint.net."
"Can you teach me to use Lightroom?" he pressed.
And I thought, sure. That's entirely possible. There's a lot less to overwhelm initially on Lightroom, and to be honest, it's a less powerful program in a lot of ways: there's nothing you can do in Lightroom that you can't do in Photoshop, but there's tons you can do in Photoshop that you can't do in Lightroom. Still, for most photo editing, bringing Photoshop into the picture is like using a backhoe for gardening.

So when we go home, I installed Lightroom on the computer we have upstairs, and we'll start editing tomorrow.
Will he love it? At first, most definitely. I look forward to sharing some of his edited images.
Will he stick with it? We'll see. But seeing how much he loves trying to copy me, I think there's a good chance we might begin something long-lasting tomorrow.



Editing isn't the only thing we'll be starting tomorrow. Spring break is now over, so we'll all head back "to school." I have real reservations about the ultimate efficacy of what I'm doing with students. Are they learning? I doubt it. Are they slipping? I hope not -- that's really the only hope most of us educators have.
Day 34: The Edge
I read somewhere recently that sanitation workers are struggling to keep up with the amount of trash people are putting out during the quarantine. We're all cleaning out our houses, I guess, because what else are we going to do with so much time on our hands?

We've been doing a little in the house but mostly in the yard. Today, for instance, I used the edger (we have an edger now -- like a router, one tool I've always wanted to have) to clean up the stepping stones in our front yard.
Why?

Well, I woke up this morning and thought, "What can I do in the yard today? It's an April Saturday -- one must work in the yard." But I'd already mowed for the week. And I'd already moved the composter. And I'd already cleaned out the weeds in our jasmine. And I'd already cleaned out the briars in the corner of our lot. And I'd already moved the elderberry bushes. And I'd already enlarged our mulched flower garden. And I'd already mulched everything. "What can I do?"
Saturday has its own rhythm, and even in these strange times, K and I try to keep all our rhythms and rituals as sustained as possible. We've introduced some new rituals (our almost-nightly family walks, lots more family board and card game playing, more family movies), but Saturday is Saturday -- it must be spent outside.

By the time I was finished working on the stepping stones, each had a clean edge cut around it, several of the stones that had settled were elevated with a bit of gravel under them, and the last few stones that weren't in line with the rest of them were shifted back into place.
As I worked, I listened to podcasts on cults: Heaven's Gate, the Manson Family, the Branch Davidians, a couple I'd never heard of. They all make the little sect I grew up in seem fairly tame in comparison, but they all have one thing in common: a narcissistic man at the helm whom everyone views as being somehow a step above the rest of humanity.

Then there are the members and the obvious question: how do people allow themselves to be sucked into such groups? Take Heaven's Gate, for example: their beliefs were so morbidly ridiculous that it's difficult to imagine anyone taking them seriously. And members of that cult (and many others) left families behind in order to join them. They gave up everything for beliefs that sound like some sixth-grader's science fiction story for his fifth-period creative writing class. Yet all religions have their little absurdities: Islam has Mohammed flying off on a magic stallion into heaven. Judaism has talking snakes and donkeys and a man surviving in the digestive system of a marine creature. Christianity has zombies immediately after Jesus's death on the cross:
And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit. At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and went into the holy city and appeared to many people. When the centurion and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the earthquake and all that had happened, they were terrified, and exclaimed, “Surely he was the Son of God!" (Matthew 27.50-54)
Hinduism has Hanuman the monkey god -- all religions have elements that just seem silly. The difference, comedian Bill Burr points out, is that most of us grew up with those more traditional religious stories and heard them all our lives: they're party of the fabric of our childhood. These cults, though, we encounter as adults, more capable of critical thinking.

In the past, I'd probably write next that I found myself thinking about these things when I put the Boy to bed, thinking about possible lives we could have given him if we believed this or that, but I didn't. I didn't even think about it until now. Don't know what to make of that, if anything.
Day 33: Celebration and Smothered
Celebration
Today is Papa's birthday. Seventy-nine. I remember when he turned forty. I was only eight then, and because of various religious interpretations, we didn't actually celebrate birthdays, but I knew it was significant. He's stayed forty or fifty in my mind's eye ever since.

Sixty just seemed like an extension -- a little older, maybe a little slower, but basically the same. Seventy? Now nearly eighty.

You know what's coming -- "Soon I'll find myself almost eighty, wondering where the time went..."
This was a bitter-sweet birthday, though: the first one without Nana. A few days ago, K asked him what he'd like for his birthday dinner. He thought about it for quite a while and asked if we had Nana's Chinese casserole recipe.
"Nope, but I'm sure we could find it."
When was the last time we had that? It must have been twenty-five to thirty years since I'd had that. Still, I knew what the recipe must look like: I found something seemingly identical and K tried to fix it while I was pulling up the mass of briars that had grown where our composter used to be. Neither one of us are experienced casserole makers, so it turned out a little, well, moist. But it tasted just like Papa and I remembered.
"Brings back some memories, doesn't it Pop?" I asked. (I don't know why, but I've taken to calling him Pop again. I used to call him that when I was in high school, but since L was born, he's just been Papa.)
"Sure does."
Smothered
I used to say I could play chess when I really couldn't. I could move the pieces around, sure, but I really had no deeper understanding of the game, and I didn't even really know some of the basics. Give me a rook and the king against the opponents lone king and I would have had no idea how to mate.
Even now, there's one mate I can only barely understand and probably couldn't pull off: mate with one knight, one bishop, and the king. Here's a good intro:
Yet there's one mate that's in the realm of mortals. "Probably the most popular checkmate pattern, the Smothered Mate often fascinates new chess players and retains its popularity even after one becomes proficient." So says Chess End Games, and that's no exaggeration. Every time I've taught someone the smothered mate pattern, I've gotten looks of amazed awe. The knight pops into a square and mates the king from a distance -- beautiful
But Chess End Games is selling it short. There are several ways to achieve a smothered mate in chess, but the most satisfying is with a queen sacrifice. Any win involving a queen sac (chess-speak there) is satisfying because, well, you're sacrificing your queen, the most powerful piece on the board -- until it isn't. Queen sac smothered mates are rare, though, because most decent players see it coming and resign beforehand.
In fact, I've only done it once -- last night.
It was a wild game, and I had taken a gamble that wasn't paying off. In fact, not just down an exchange but down an entire rook, I felt sure mate was coming. My opponent sacrificed the exchange, though, taking my knight on f4.

I took with the pawn thinking that I might be able to slide the rook over to g2 to put pressure on g7. It would have been easily mitigated with a pawn move g6, but it was the only thing I saw.

Black took my undefended d4 pawn, threatening my rook. My first instinct was to continue with my plan and move my rook to g2, but then I saw it: my queen and knight were perfectly placed, and with black's rook pair gone, it looked perfect.

Queen took on e6 with check. From here, mate was almost inevitable. Almost. I thought black might resign or bock with his rook, which would have led to mate with black's king on h8 and white's queen on f8 or d8 after having taken the double-attacked rook.

But black moved the king to h8 and my heart went pitter-patter. Could I get the smothered mate or would black resign?

The first move was to pop the knight in for a check. If black took with the rook, I was in trouble: my next move would have been to take with the queen, then black's queen would deliver a nearly-fatal check on f2 and mate would have been coming. But black didn't see it.

King to g8. "It's going to happen!" I thought.

Knight to h6 gave a double check, so black cannot take the knight or simply block the queen,

Black had to move back to h8 -- or resign. "Oh, please don't resign!

No resignation! Next came the most seemingly crazy move ever: the queen slid into g7 for check. Black could not take with the king because the knight defended the queen; black had to take with the rook.

The only problem is, in doing so, black took away the king's only remaining flight square. The king was boxed in completely.

Knight to f7 for mate.

I can't remember the last time I smiled so after a simple chess game.
Day 32: Changes
We pulled out that hideously overgrown ornamental tree by our front door earlier this week (or technically last week, I guess, but everything's mushing together like a cheap blended scotch), so we had to replace it with something. Well, K felt we had to replace it with something. I was rather okay with just leaving it, but I was also okay with replacing it -- I was just okay with it. Today, I headed out to get the replacement and a few flowers.
The plan was simple: go to Home Depot for the replacement battery for my drill and a few other things, then head over to South Pleasantburg Nursery for the tree.
"Take a picture of what's there and show the man what was there," K said. "He'll help you pick something out that will fill that space."

L went with me. "Take L -- she'll pick out nice flowers," K suggested.
Home Depot took much longer than expected. Ridiculously long.
Then we head over to the nursery only to discover it's closed: order-by-phone only. So it was back to Home Depot.
Their tree selection is not stellar, let me tell you.

We decided on a relatively mature Japanese maple, but there was no price tag, only a bar code. The Home Depot app, hastily installed, couldn't find the price, so I photographed the bar code and went into buy it. "How much could it cost?" I asked myself.
The answer: $170.
"Um, no, I don't think we want that tree," I managed to stammer out. We went back and found a less mature specimen that was only $95.
The question is, why does a tree cost $170? Or $95? Or any given price? I understand Home Depot's mark up is fairly predictable, but what about their purchase price?
K and I talked about it this evening. Somehow that price must take into account the salaries of the nursery employees, the resources (food, water, electricity) applied to the sapling or necessary for the nursery itself, the taxes and other expenses the nursery pays -- all that compounded over the amount of time necessary for the sapling to reach its desired height and divided by the number of saplings that reach that marketable state at the same time.
"Whatever the expenses, it's a rip-off," K laughed in conclusion.

Back home, K planted the tree while I embarked on a second project: moving the composter we got for free when friends moved north. It's current location was much closer to the house, but the barrel had somehow gotten off the gears that turn the whole contraption, and that was simply because it was no longer level, thanks in large part, I think, to the dog's digging.

Day 31: The Walk
I’ve been reading Faulkner and thought it might be fun to emulate him. Forgive me.
Having cleaned up after dinner, a process that entails both the obvious cycling of dishes back to the dishwasher only hours after having taken them out to hide them neatly in stacks concealed behind cabinet doors only to place them on the table yet again in and endless cycle that is the bane of our children’s existence and the not so obvious assisting Papa in his regimen of oral hygiene procedures foisted on him by childhood dental neglect, a regimen that has become a comforting habit rather than a chore, we head out for our evening walk, a Covid-19-induced habit that might be the best outcome of a worst-case scenario. Tired of the usual routes, we’ve taken to walking a circuit that runs through the neighborhood just across from ours, a newer neighborhood without power lines snaked between crooked power poles but not so new as to have sidewalks, a neighborhood with a slightly more eclectic mix of architecture. For about a year now this has been our favorite route, in part because K likes the feel of the neighborhood more than others, in part because of its distance — almost exactly a mile — and in part because of the long, straight, flat stretch that it includes where the kids, L on her rollerblades and E on his bike, play a strangely frustrating version of tag that includes time outs and random rules that E is convinced — and I am likely to agree — are L’s on-the-spot inventions intended to keep her from being tagged.
Enough — how that man could write like that, though what I did was just a pale imitation, lacking the lugubrious flourish he put into every sentence as if it were the habit of a card cheat. See? Once you start writing like that, start thinking like that, once you start piling phrase upon phrase, clause upon clause, it’s almost impossible to stop, so maybe that’s how he did it: just a big push and off he went, heedless of periods, question marks, semicolons, and anything else resembling in its vaguest form something that someone could accuse of being an ending, a final mark on the paper to suggest “Stop.” The result, in all seriousness, is nothing short of breathtaking. His greatest achievement, Absalom, Absalom!, just sings right from the opening sentences.
From a little after two o’clock until almost sundown of the long still hot weary dead September afternoon they sat in what Miss Coldfield still called the office because her father had called it that-a dim hot airless room with the blinds all closed and fastened for forty-three summers because when she was a girl someone had believed that light and moving air carried heat and that dark was always cooler, and which (as the sun shone fuller and fuller on that side of the house) became latticed with yellow slashes full of dust motes which Quentin thought of as being flecks of the dead old dried paint itself blown inward from the scaling blinds as wind might have blown them. There was a wistaria vine blooming for the second time that summer on a wooden trellis before one window, into which sparrows came now and then in random gusts, making a dry vivid dusty sound before going away: and opposite Quentin, Miss Coldfield in the eternal black which she had worn for forty- three years now, whether for sister, father, or nothusband none knew, sitting so bolt upright in the straight hard chair that was so tall for her that her legs hung straight and rigid as if she had iron shinbones and ankles, clear of the floor with that air of impotent and static rage like children’s feet, and talking in that grim haggard amazed voice until at last listening would renege and hearing-sense self-confound and the long-dead object of her impotent yet indomitable frustration would appear, as though by outraged recapitulation evoked, quiet inattentive and harmless, out of the biding and dreamy and victorious dust. Her voice would not cease, it would just vanish. There would be the dim coffin-smelling gloom sweet and oversweet with the twice-bloomed wistaria against the outer wall by the savage quiet September sun impacted distilled and hyperdistilled, into which came now and then the loud cloudy flutter of the sparrows like a flat limber stick whipped by an idle boy, and the rank smell of female old flesh long embattled in virginity while the wan haggard face watched him above the faint triangle of lace at wrists and throat from the too tall chair in which she resembled a crucified child; and the voice not ceasing but vanishing into and then out of the long intervals like a stream, a trickle running from patch to patch of dried sand, and the ghost mused with shadowy docility as if it were the voice which he haunted where a more fortunate one would have had a house.
Four sentences weighing in at just a little over 400 words, with three of the sentences doing most of the work: that third sentence is so perfectly short (“Her voice would not cease, it would just vanish.”) that it creates the perfect rhythm, a little pause in the thinking that gives both authenticity to the voice and rest to the reader.
I’m reading Absalom now, probably for the tenth or twelfth time, and each time I read it, I notice a little something that had escaped my attention previously: some little piece to the puzzle (for the book is, at its heart, a puzzle to match the puzzle that is living itself), some lovely phrase, some little something. I don’t think I will ever tire of that book, and every time I finish it, I look forward eventually to starting it again: “From a little after two o’clock until almost sundown of the long still hot weary dead September afternoon they sat in what Miss Coldfield still called the office…”










